Train a Brand Design Guidelines Skill
Turn approved brand materials and strong examples into a reusable visual-design skill for websites, slides, documents, and social graphics.
What you'll need
- Current brand guidelines, logo files, color specifications, and licensed font files or links
- Five to ten approved examples across the formats the skill should create
- Source links or files that identify which materials are authoritative
- The artifact types the skill should support, such as websites, slides, documents, or social graphics
- Accessibility requirements and any legal, partner, or asset-usage restrictions
Put it to work
Save these instructions in a Claude Skill or Project, or in a ChatGPT Project or Custom GPT. Add your context, run the sample prompt, and check the result against your team's standards before anyone relies on it.
Claude vs. ChatGPT
This version packages the result as a Claude Skill with reference files and approved assets. In another assistant, save the same brand system, artifact rules, and QA checklist in a Project or custom assistant.
Reusable playbook
Learn the method, adapt the details, then put it to work.
What this playbook helps you do
Build a reusable Brand Design Guidelines Skill from the approved materials I provide.
Follow the playbook
Objective
Learn the visual system behind my brand, document which rules are authoritative versus inferred, and package those rules so an AI can create and review new assets without drifting into generic design.
Evidence boundaries
- 1
Treat an official brand guide as the highest-authority source, followed by approved design-system files, then approved examples.
- 2
Never treat an arbitrary old asset as a rule just because it exists. Flag conflicts and ask which source wins.
- 3
Do not redraw, distort, recolor, or invent a logo. Do not fabricate colors, fonts, licenses, partner marks, photography rights, or accessibility claims.
- 4
Preserve original source files. Work from copies or references and do not modify approved assets.
- 5
Label every guideline as Documented, Observed, or Proposed:
- Documented: stated in an authoritative source.
- Observed: repeated consistently across approved examples.
- Proposed: a gap-filling recommendation that requires my approval.
- 6
Do not create the final skill until I approve the evidence audit and proposed system.
Audit the source material
Inventory every supplied source with
- Source name and direct file or document link
- Artifact type and date, when known
- Authority level
- What it contributes to the system
- Conflicts, gaps, or usage restrictions
Analyze only examples I identify as approved. When examples disagree, preserve the disagreement instead of averaging it into a new rule.
Extract the visual system
Identity and logo
- Approved logo variants and when each is used
- Clear space, minimum size, alignment, and background rules
- Co-branding or partner-lockup rules
- Explicit incorrect-use examples
Color
- Primary, secondary, accent, neutral, background, and semantic roles
- Exact supplied values for digital and print; never estimate a color by eye when a specification exists
- Permitted combinations and contrast requirements
Typography
- Approved font families, fallbacks, weights, and licenses or availability
- Type roles for display, heading, body, label, caption, and data
- Size, line-height, tracking, case, and emphasis patterns by artifact type
Composition
- Grid, margins, alignment, density, whitespace, spacing scale, border radius, stroke, and shadow patterns
- Repeated hierarchy rules that make an artifact recognizably ours
- Rules that change between web, slides, documents, and social graphics
Imagery and graphics
- Photography subject, composition, lighting, crop, and treatment
- Illustration, icon, texture, diagram, and data-visualization style
- What to avoid, with evidence from the approved sources
Accessibility and production
- Contrast, legibility, minimum type, alternative text, motion, and color-only communication rules
- Export sizes, file formats, bleed, safe zones, and responsive behavior when documented
Turn observations into usable guidance
For every rule, record
- The rule in plain language
- Status: Documented, Observed, or Proposed
- Source link and page, frame, or example location
- Where it applies
- One compliant example and one non-compliant example
- Confidence: high, medium, or low
Keep brand voice out of this skill except where short visual copy affects typography or layout. Refer copywriting work to the separate brand voice skill.
Define artifact modes
Create specific guidance for each requested mode rather than one universal style:
- 1
Website and product UI
- 2
Presentation slides
- 3
Documents and reports
- 4
Social and campaign graphics
For each included mode, define its canvas or breakpoints, hierarchy, grid, component patterns, image treatment, density, and final export checks. Omit unsupported modes instead of inventing rules.
Deliverables and approval gate
First, show me
- The source inventory and authority order
- The proposed design tokens and visual rules
- Conflicts and missing decisions
- Coverage by artifact mode
- The exact files and approved assets you plan to package
After I approve, create
brand-design-guidelines/ ├── SKILL.md ├── assets/ │ └── [approved logos, fonts, templates, or linked asset index only] └── references/ ├── brand-system.md ├── artifact-rules.md └── qa-checklist.md
Keep SKILL.md concise. It should explain when the skill applies, how to choose an artifact mode, which reference files to read, and which approval or asset restrictions must never be bypassed.
Put the evidence-backed tokens and identity rules in brand-system.md. Put mode-specific layout and production rules in artifact-rules.md. Put the preflight review in qa-checklist.md.
Required QA behavior
Before declaring any new artifact complete, the finished skill must:
- 1
Identify the artifact mode and intended audience.
- 2
List the approved assets and rules it is applying.
- 3
Check logo use, color, typography, hierarchy, spacing, imagery, accessibility, and export requirements.
- 4
Flag any unsupported design decision as proposed instead of silently inventing it.
- 5
Return a short compliance report with direct links to the supporting guidelines.
- 6
Require human review before publishing, printing, or replacing an approved template.
Validation
Test the draft skill against at least one representative artifact in every supported mode. Compare the result with an approved example, record each mismatch, revise the rule that caused it, and rerun the check. A visually polished output is not automatically on brand; the evidence and QA checklist decide.
Try this prompt
Train a Brand Design Guidelines Skill from the files and examples in this folder. Start by inventorying the official brand guide, logo assets, colors, fonts, and five to ten examples I have marked approved. Separate documented rules from observed patterns and proposed gap-fillers. Cover websites, slides, documents, and social graphics only where the evidence supports them. Show me the source audit, proposed visual system, conflicts, missing decisions, and file plan before creating the skill. Do not change any original assets or invent missing brand rules.
Before you trust the output
- Use only examples a brand owner has marked approved so accidental one-off designs do not become permanent rules
- Keep documented, observed, and proposed guidance separate, with a source link for every important decision
- Package approved assets or an asset index with the skill so the AI uses real logos, fonts, and templates instead of recreating them
- Define rules by artifact mode because a presentation, website, report, and social graphic need different composition guidance
- Test the skill against representative approved work and require a compliance review before anything is published
Your next step
Want this workflow to run reliably every week?
Bring Train a Brand Design Guidelines Skill to our free live workshop. We'll show you how to turn the reusable instructions into a working AI Agent Skill—without writing code.